Media is a significant source of information for people both inside and outside of specified limits in today’s world. It has typically served as a link between the government and the general public. It empowers people on both sides to obtain information and comments from the other, so forming a link between citizens and government. The primary source of information is the media. It comes in a variety of formats, including print, virtual, and social media.
Media has established a great role with the assistance of technology and simple access, notably in a democratic nation where it is demanded of the media to be devoid of any biases. It is referred to as the democracy’s fourth pillar. It shapes people’s opinions and is one of the most trustworthy sources of information because it is anticipated that the media will always deliver accurate and honest information. People’s faith, on the other hand, has begun to erode in the modern day. Considerations of free media and the rationale of the media’s activities are pushed to the side.
All types of media are essential and have a big influence on the general public. In today’s world, social media is one of the most widely used types of media. All types of media will be discussed, as well as their impact on a democratic society. Other considerations include whether the media is governed by a governing body or whether it is completely independent. Is there a need for a check on its actions if it is completely free? The information presented in the media is used by people both inside and outside of the country.
All sorts of data produced by a country’s media are used by the media and people in other countries. It is located somewhere symbolizing a country’s image and how it is seen by others. Misappropriated data can lead to a misleading message in the mass in such a setting where we are so globalized and media is widely accessed and has an effect. The connection between crime and the public’s perception of it is critical in developing a criminal justice system. Media exposure of crime news items serves to set the narrative and maintain support for punishing policies.
Moral panics regarding the consequences of access to mainstream media and cultural forms have a long history. There are two perspectives on how the media creates moral panics: conservatives think the media glamorizes crime and trivializes public insecurity, while liberals believe the media exaggerates crime and creates moral panics to support totalitarian crime control policies.
The types of punishment meted out are determined by a society’s political context. It is frequently asserted that the law is meant to discourage the guilty thought rather than the individual. Punishment is used to reduce the number of crimes committed by forbidding or preventing recurrent offenses.
The Media’s Development
For a long period, the media has been a means of communication and a platform that upholds democratic norms. It is used to raise public awareness about government actions, people’s rights, and to control the government’s wrongdoings by holding them accountable and uniting with the people whose rights are impacted. The only form of media in the early phases of technology advancement was print, and a less evolved version of it was news on the radio.
Digital media developed over time, incorporating a large number of people in the process. Then there are social media, which is the most advanced and widely used type of media in today’s world, where individuals have information in their palms via mobile phones. It contributes to a shift in communication, and today even a single individual can utilize the forum to question the administration.
With only a click, media has become an instantly accessible, more immediate, and faster mode of content delivery. This has aided in the raising of several issues in today’s society. The way print and digital media deliver information has also changed; they are attempting to be more appealing and engaging to attract the greatest number of viewers and readers. The press is now oriented on views rather than news, and news stations have given way to views channels. The scramble to cover breaking news first has altered the way information is released.
Having headlines just with some catchy words and the way they are presented sometimes deviates from the news. All this evolved media phase has its advantages and disadvantages but one thing that cannot be overlooked is that it is an integral part of the democratic society and has a duty and responsibility towards the society.
The Media’s Significance in Today’s Time
As technology advances and spreads, a considerable portion of society is attached to a simulated model of media, whether through televisions, mobile phones, or other gadgets. At this time, when the world is turning at such a breakneck pace, there is an enormous amount of information available to be disseminated to society’s citizens. Different incidences within and beyond the country have been reported, surveys have been undertaken, discussions have been ended, and interviews have been conducted, all of which provide a wealth of information to the public.
People can listen to their lawmakers and their perspectives on concerns through interviews and discussions, which creates a strong interaction between the state and the citizens. Various surveys have held institutions responsible, and various occurrences have been reported to aid in gathering knowledge about what is going on in the world. Now, how these things are portrayed is equally significant in forming the public’s perception of the country.
Recently, different cases are being reported by the media that made people aware and people have reacted to it well. Some of the examples of it are the Nirbhaya case which was led as a movement by the people, the Asaram Bapu case, Ram Rahim Case, Jessica Lal Murder Case, The Priyadarshini Mattoo Cae, and many others. These were the incidents where reporting by the media played a major role.
Media And Justice Mechanism
As a rather prominent part of society, the media has figured prominently in preserving the public interest. In certain instances, media pressure has sped up and evened up the probe. It also contributed during the Covid-19 outbreak, when individuals were going through a rough patch and the media was the one sending information from the authorities to the public and vice versa. Migrant workers have been known to travel considerable distances to visit their homes, which has forced the government to account for its actions. Because of the media, the judiciary has become aware of certain societal issues and has taken suo moto action to ensure that people are treated fairly.
When patients were not provided ample treatment in hospitals and were dying, the Supreme Court took the case on its own and commanded management to make adequate provisions, holding governments accountable and securing justice. In such a case, it is the media that offers details to the administration and aids in ensuring that everyone is treated fairly. There were numerous such instances in which the media played an important part in guaranteeing justice and expressing the concerns of the general public.
That’s the purpose of the media, and it is executing it admirably. Is there, however, another side to it? The system also has several flaws at the same time.
In some scenarios, the media takes on an overbearing role and detracts from its intended purpose. The term “media trial” is well-known. A media trial is essentially the media doing a pre-trial investigation of the person charged based on information obtained from news outlets, which may or may not be accurate. The primary harm it causes is that it instills in the minds of others an opinion that tarnishes the image of the person accused. The notion that a person is suspected until he or she is convicted by a court is ignored by the media in this case.
As formerly indicated, the media is a tremendous wellspring of data. Nonetheless, the media’s prominence has experienced tremendous growth. In a democratic country, it is essential to have an open and democratic media to maintain the nature of democracy. It should not be susceptible to any institutional pressure. However, a portion of the media is diverging from the true purpose and its impartiality and is exercising its right to free speech and expression in a way that negatively impacts a segment of society.
This is when some acceptable rules or regulations to govern them are required. It is also the responsibility of the media to recognize that people trust them, and it is their responsibility to deliver accurate, dependable, and authentic information; if this is not done, people will lose faith in the media, which would be the worst circumstance for a country like India to confront. The administration must not try to sway the media for its gain, and the media should not attempt to exert pressure on the judiciary. All of the pillars of a democratic country ought to be free of extraneous and unwarranted interference for the country to operate optimally and the democratic spirit to be preserved.
As a result, the media, as a regulatory body, civic forum, and ideology-setter, facilitates positive justice and good governance by enabling government oversight and integrity, inspecting misuse of power, bolstering the public sphere, and showcasing disastrous policies, gross incompetence, debacle, and corruption by decision-makers in the public and private sectors, all of which foster the development.
As a result, all participants in any of these spheres must acknowledge this reality and strive to encourage it. Individuals should always be on the lookout for methods to make the most of the media’s output. Leaders must constantly ensure a stable distance since their actions are amplified by the media.